(December 2012)
You remember when you were in school and
had to write an essay, but knew you really had nothing to say? How you’d try to
make it seem like it was longer by writing really big, double spacing, and
leaving even more space after the margin than there was before it (I know,
handwritten essays, how terribly 20th century)? Well, that’s exactly
what the publishers have done with this book.
Hmm. Clockwork Orange, you say? Well, just
maybe you might be on to something. Teen alienation, sexual violence,
submission and domination, nihilism that would be terrifying in an adult, let
alone a teenager. I should probably stop there, given I’m basing this all on
the film. Another book to add to the ‘should probably get around to reading at
some point’ pile.
Is there a less enthusiastically named pile? If so, add it to that one.
ReplyDeleteYou wouldn't recommend it then?
DeleteDo you think Ryu Murakami is actually any good? I'm sure every person outside of Japan has stumbled across his books while searching for Haruki Murakami and then was impressed by the outrageousness of it all, drugs and sodomy, et cetera.
ReplyDeleteWords like "prize winning" without mentioning what prize and "cult classic" usually mean that it is rubbish. The cover is fucking shit and so is the title, that's for sure.
Yeah, I really rate him, to be honest. You're probably right about how people find out about him, but he's significant in his own right, I think.
DeleteThis won the Akutagawa Prize, which is actually fairly major as far as I'm aware. In fairness I doubt most English speaking readers would have heard of it, so I can see why not naming would make sense. You're right about 'cult classic' being meaningless though.
There's a tit on the cover! It's a very tasteful tit, mind. I genuinely didn't realise what it was until I was looking for a picture online for this post. Shows how much attention I pay to that kind of thing nowadays, sadly :(