(March 2013)
I blame Austin Powers.
Now, in the more innocent (ahem) times
B.A.P. the makers of the Bond films and their imitators felt quite happy to
crank out the same old formula revolving around sex, violence, weak innuendo,
and the fundamentally essential work of maintaining a world order with heterosexual
white men at the pinnacle. Then along came Mr. Myers and, if nothing else, took
the weak innuendo off the table.
And that killed Bond, or at least the Roger
Moore, Piers Brosnan, raised-eyebrow ‘cunning linguist’ incarnation. Without
the figleaf of more or less ironic humour the latent misogyny and racism of the
series had nothing to hide behind. It took the Bourne films to show the way to
do secret agents in a P.A.P. world. Less of the jokes and the sex, more of the monosyllabic
violence, and you’ll get to keep your world order as it is. The antidote to parody
is grit, because while parodists can happily lampshade the more coercive
aspects of Bond’s traditional seduction techniques, they’re less willing to
tackle the straight-up tortures, murders, and rapes.
Actually, scratch that. The tortures and
murders are fine. Fertile ground for comedy, those. Rape and violence against
women, not so much. At least not if you want to make money out of it; you can
implicitly endorse the attitudes leading to them, but woe betide anyone seen
overtly playing them for laughs.
Grit isn’t really an antidote to parody, then, but
more of an attempted vaccine. Parody-proofing by making things so unpromising
as source material for comedy that no satirist wants to touch the stuff. And thus
we end up with the current Bond incarnation and his more ‘complicated’
relationships with women and take on gender politics (though in fairness, for my money Daniel Craig’s Bond
is the closest any incumbent of the role has got to the books since Timothy
Dalton. Because as written Bond is a screaming, gaping arsehole of the first
degree, and thus the Craig-era Bond films are not so much a reboot as a more
faithful reinterpretation of the original source material).
Which is all by way of saying that the two
books I was most reminded of whilst reading The
Killing Moon were Small Gods and Pyramids.
This is the highest of High Fantasy; kings
and ambassadors, High Priests and humble men of royal blood. It’s very good, I
have to make that perfectly clear. But it’s also clearly something of a
reaction to those trends towards grimdark grittiness prevalent in the wider
genre. This means that here you get: genuinely engaging and proactive
characters of both genders; sex and violence that are mainly threatened instead
of depicted, and that which is depicted is mostly done so off-screen; only a single white
character in the book (who, blessedly, isn’t the Chosen One leading everyone
else to their destinies); and a well-realized world which is defiantly not medieval
Europe with a lick of paint. Everything, in fact, that we should be seeing
more of – yet my first point of reference was Terry Pratchett.
Jemisin plays it all with an incredibly straight
bat – there are no little genre-savvy asides or self-conscious references. The
decision to get by on quality of storytelling alone is actually quite a brave
one; that figleaf of cautious irony is conspicuous by its absence. It’s definitely
a decision that pays off but still, every time Nijiri appeared on the page I
couldn’t help but think of Pteppic.
I don’t quite know where I’m going with
this. Some things can’t be unseen, I suppose. I’m not a huge fan of Fantasy,
though obviously I enjoy it on occasion. By far my largest exposure to the
genre has been through the Discworld and I guess I’ll have to make my peace
with the fact that’s going to colour everything else I read. But if a book can
stand comparison with that and survive then it must be doing something right. The Killing Moon can and does and is.
Recommended.
I was reminded of this from your post:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX1PwkgwsG0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX1PwkgwsG0
DeleteSame here... Love that song.
Goddamit. That's another half-hour I don't have gone listening to New Romantics and mid-80s Electronica on youtube...
DeleteYou lost me when you said whitey doesn't play the chosen one to lead the morons outta the wilderness....I ain't buying that ludicrous malarkey.
ReplyDeleteWhitey leads while dark skin folks kill each other or pick fruits near the equator.
C'mon man...you know that....right?...right?
I know, right? It's like she's completely unaware of actual historical events as explained in documents such as Dances with Wolves, The Last Samurai, and Avatar. If she can't even be bothered with basic research, than there's no helping her. Some people, eh?
DeleteBelieve it or not, I actually read a post or two about "grimdark," which I think is a hilarious name for a subgenre. Fortunately, I'm not so invested in Fantasy as to care all that much. I kind of gave up on the genre when I grew out of Dragonlance, but your words here encourage me to check out Jemisin. (Says I as I hack through Memory Sorrow and Thorn. My heavens, that's long.)
ReplyDeleteYou could choose worse places to dip back into it. A quick look at the archives here should show that I'm not all that into it either, but this was still pretty good on its own terms.
DeleteI wish I could make time to read everything I want to read. I had this out from the library recently but didn't have time to get to it. Maybe another day.
ReplyDeleteI suppose this is the wrong place to admit how much I love the Bourne films and the latest Bond ones too? :)
Not at all. For all I have reservations about the politics, I still enjoy them. That said, the Skyfall dvd is still on the shelf in its plastic wrapping from Christmas. I can certainly get where you're coming from wrt the lack of time :(
Delete