(December 2017)
The first of Malka Older’s Centenal Cycle, the
last of which comes out this summer. Given all the other trilogies I’ve still
to catch up on, starting a new one seems like a bit of a leap of faith, but I’m
very glad I did. The “relate it to what the reader knows” tagline would be something
like “Snow Crash meets The West Wing,” in that Older takes the
almost throw-away concept of micropolities from Stevenson’s book and then
explores that through the slightly melodramatic viewpoints of young political
operatives working behind the scenes. The two main PoV characters are Ken, a
fixer for the broadly progressive Policy1st party, and Mishima, a security
chief for Information.
Following a worldwide conflict of some sort (Isn't
it always?), the world's governance has been reconfigured into a kind of global
first past the post system. Each constituency is an even 100,000 people, which
obviously mans that they're packed very tight in urban areas and cover large
swathes of wilderness. In major cities the laws thus change from block to block,
à
la Snow Crash. There are global
elections once every decade, and campaign for the third such is in full swing.
These are policed by Information, which is essentially Google with its own
police force, and the closest thing this world has to a global bureaucracy.
There's a tonne of interesting stuff going on
here, but I'm going to hang my thoughts off the main characters' names. "Ken”
is almost a cliché among Anglophones with connections to Japan, as it’s one of
the few boys’ names that exists in both traditions. It wasn’t so long ago that
practically every middle-school English textbook would have a character of
uncertain ethnicity by the name, fulfilling the tired role of mixed heritage
characters in fiction everywhere of being simultaneously both relatable and
different, of being safely other.
So I was slightly wary of similar tropes cropping
up here, especially once it’s revealed that this Ken is also mixed heritage, from
"all over." However, one of the key concerns of the book is the resilience
of national identity—a significant sub-plot is the increasingly militaristic
rhetoric of a Japanese nativist Party—and Ken’s positioning as the
personification of some of these concerns arguments is handled with a merciful
degree of nuance.
Which brings us to the monomonikered Mishima. This
is usually a Japanese family name, perhaps most (in)famously of Mishima Yukio—author,
bodybuilder, failed coup instigator, suicide. His Wikipedia page is well worth
a read, and once you’ve done so you’ll see why Older’s choice to give the penname
of this arch-nationalist to the effective head of a post-national, global
police force piqued my interest. This Mishima also skirts very close to some
rather tired tropes (kick-ass Asian lady with distinctively coloured hair, specifically),
but is once again the conduit for some of the book’s wider concerns. She’s also
eventually revealed to be almost charmingly neurotic, which certainly punctures
the slightly tired cool facade and helps lift her off the page immeasurably. I
liked it when she stabbed Ken.
There is a third PoV character, who’s largely uninteresting,
exists mainly to act as a foil for Mishima, and whose name I’ve completely
forgotten, which is where the pattern of this post rather falls down. This is a
dense book that takes a while to get into (back to Stephenson again), but which
I ended up enjoying greatly. It was also, sadly, and through no fault of its
own, quite depressing. It's still new enough that I'll mark the reason why with
SPOILERS. At the end of the book, when it turns out that the election's been
rigged, then there's a bit of frantic kerfuffle and then it's all put right (or
at least, not wrong) by the powers that be in a matter of days. Given what we
now know about only one (or, it's increasingly looking like, both) of the big
elections that took place in 2016, that now seems painfully optimistic. Not
Older's fault, of course, but you can't read the climax and dénouement without
it being hammered home in the most uncompromising manner that you are, in fact,
and unfortunately, reading a work of fiction.
No comments:
Post a Comment