(August 2014)
My kids are, as is now mandatory, huge fans
of Frozen. Fortunately it’s a pretty
good movie; I don’t know if my increased tolerance for schmaltz is due to parenthood
or if it’s simply concomitant with the increased confidence of age, but god I
love me a showtune. Let it Go has
inevitably joined Jabberwocky and Where the Wild Things Are in the limited
pantheon of things I can recite the words to by heart.
Look, I’ve had to watch this film a lot, OK?
The other movie I’ve been able to (re)watch
recently was Jarhead. There’s a bit where
all the marines are watching the Ride of
the Valkyries scene in Apocalypse Now
– you remember, the bit where a load of other fictional marines fly in on attack
helicopters and massacre an entire village – and whooping and cheering the place up. On the DVD commentary Anthony Swafford (the ex-marine who wrote the
book) explains the incongruity of soldiers cheering this massively anti-war
film by saying simply that when shown to marines, every film become pro-war. With that in mind, you’ll enjoy this
clip; skipping forward to 2.10 is well recommended.
So then, The Death of the Author. Once your
work is out there you’ve no control over how people will perceive it, and your
opinions on whatever its ‘truth’ may be are no more or less valid than anyone
else’s. If people want to see your charming family comedy as a fist-pumping
salute to American exceptionalism and martial power (“I don’t care what
they’re going to say.”) then that’s entirely their prerogative. Or if they want
to see it as a big coming out party for Elsa in specific and Disney in general
then that’s just dandy. You’ll probably guess that I personally favour the
second of those interpretations.
Woolf originally saw Orlando as a “writers holiday” after the more exacting To The Lighthouse (it says here), and
was pleasantly surprised by how seriously it was taken after its publication. Like
Elsa, it’s an exercise in hiding in plain sight, being as it is a fictionalized
biography of Vita Sackville-West, an aristocratic bon vivant upon whom Woolf apparently
had a bit of a crush. Not without a certain irony, in Orlando Woolf gives us a writer who resolutely refuses to die, as
the title character in born in Elizabethan times and lives for over 300 years.
And changes sex halfway through (Sackville-West was bisexual). I use sex as
opposed to gender, as this is clearly a very significant work in the way it
preempts the performative turn, i.e. the theory that identity (and gender as an
aspect of identity) is not innate but performed; it’s not the case that people are male or female, but that they perform maleness and femaleness. Your
gender is what it is as a result of how you act it: Orlando pays the physiological
aspects of her transformation from man to woman no heed whatsoever; it’s only
once she has to start wearing dresses and petticoats that she feels herself
becoming/acting (the two words are largely interchangeable here) female.
So there’s substance beneath the froth,
clearly. But froth there is, and it’s worth noting that for all the genuinely
important issues addressed in Orlando,
there’s still a very clear sense of fun. I managed to get a fair bit of the
satire, so can only hazard a guess at how much more is there for people who
actually know about this stuff, but even if you miss the in-jokes Woolf still
does a great line in metatextual bathos:
Nature, who has played so many queer tricks upon us, making us so
unequally of clay and diamonds, of rainbow and granite, and stuffed them into a
case, often of the most incongruous, for the poet has a butcher’s face and the
butcher a poet’s; nature, who delights in muddle and mystery, so that even now
(the first of November 1927) we know not why we go upstairs, or why we come
down again, our most daily movements are like the passage of a ship on an unknown
sea, and the sailors at the mast-head ask, pointing their glasses to the
horizon; Is there land or is their none? to which, if we are prophets, we make
the answer ‘Yes’; if we are truthful we say ‘No’; nature, who has so much to
answer for besides the perhaps unwieldy length of this sentence…
She’s funny, is what I’m saying. And without
resorting to comedy sidekick snowmen, either. It’s still a product of its time
and place though, and the occasional racial epithet can’t help but remind you
of this and jar you out of your progressive gushing, and for all that it seeks
to question attitudes towards gender it still seems to accept the underlying
paradigm as essentially binary. Still, a journey of a thousand miles and all
that, and when there are so many battles still to be fought you take what succor
you can. Let the storm rage on.
Miraculously, I have seen (in full at least) exactly zero of the films and books you reference here. (We have the Frozen soundtrack, but the kids have headphones; the movie has been on at other people's houses, but I've been talking to adults, etc.) Nonetheless, the way you move between them all is most impressive. It is a very enjoyable read.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I'd say about 50% (or more) of my free time is in some way linked to Frozen right now, even if it is just saying, 'No, we can't watch it right now. Maybe later,' over and over again, so it was good to find an excuse to talk about it here, however tenuous the link (though I appreciate the 'impressive' line, however tatemae it might be ;)
Delete