Or, Believing
Your Own Bullshit
So this is going to be about the Comfort
Women (again). And as an added topical extra I’m also going to be talking about
#gamergate. If you find either of those two terms meaningful and want to
back out now I wouldn’t blame you in the slightest.
The Asahi is a vaguely left of centre
newspaper, but bear in mind this is Japan, where the ‘centre’ is so far to the
right that the entire body politic’s sense of balance is totally askew, thus the
country has spent the last quarter-century with the sociopolitical equivalent
of a crippling inner-ear disorder and a club-foot, endlessly limping round in
circles while under the misguided impression that it’s somehow making forward
progress. Regardless, the Asahi is one of the few publications to do anything
other than cheer mindlessly for whichever of the LDP factions that happens to
be in power at the time and as such has accumulated its fair share of enemies.
Recently it owned up to making a mistake
which, you’d imagine, is just good journalistic practice. Human fallibility being
what it is, no publication is going to get stuff right 100% of the time and,
given the reach and influence of national newspapers, any institution which
holds even the slightest regard for ‘the truth’ should look to rectify errors
as swiftly and as publicly as possible. What the Asahi got wrong and
subsequently corrected was to give credence to (in hindsight unreliable) evidence
from a 'recruiter' claiming that he, and through him the Japanese army, coerced women into prostitution
during WWII.
This, as you will have no doubt guessed,
has sparked of something of a shitstorm. The less appalling strand of the
fallout has been the establishment pile-on as the slavering ranks of right-wing
media and politicians (i.e. pretty much all of them) have barged each other out
of the way to gut-flop onto the Asahi for its admission of fallibility (as lord
knows none of them would ever own up to make an error). This has been
unedifying, to say the least.
More depressing, yet equally inevitable,
has been the same nationalistic twatsticks using the repudiation of one piece
of the evidence regarding the existence of comfort women as a reason to call
into question the issue in its entirety. Because clearly the validity of whole
edifice was based solely upon the reports of a single Japanese man
as opposed to, say, the first-hand testimony of hundreds of Korean and Chinese
women (among others). Never mind the overwhelming mass of additional evidence,
the inadmissibility of this one aspect of it means that all bets are off:
“Your Honour, we move
to dismiss the case.”
“On what grounds?”
“The state maintains
that my client consumed Merlot on the evening of the fourth, when it was in
fact a nice Chianti with which the deceased’s
liver was consumed. Furthermore, Dr. Lecter would like it on record that he
would never serve something as petit bourgeois as mange tout.”
Sane and rational commentary |
This is of course bollocks of the highest order, but the real kicker is that these self same pundits and politicians have been accusing the Asahi of making Japan look bad to the rest of the world. As though that hadn’t already been achieved by countless petty protests demanding the removal of memorials and monuments; as though that hadn’t already been achieved by senior officials belittling the issue at every fucking turn; as though that hadn’t already been achieved by needlessly reviewing the Kono statement, which remains the single most visible instrument through which Japan has accepted some measure of culpability. Let’s blame it on the Asahi! Let’s blame it on China! Let’s blame it on Korea! Let’s blame it on anyone except ourselves and our continued inability to actually take some fucking moral responsibility for our past actions and our perpetual insistence on not taking it in the loudest most ham-fisted manner possible.
2. Ethics in Gaming
Journalism
AHAAAAAAAAA
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!! Ethics in gaming journalism. This
is a thing that people get genuinely upset about. What a fucking joke. I feel
sullied and debased just for making the juxtaposition of this infantile horseshit
with a real-world, meaningful issue. Basically, #gamergate is an ongoing
dummy-spitting exercise whereby a video game developer (which is apparently a
real career now) split up with her boyfriend, who then posted a bitter rant about
her on the internet, and she ended up getting death threats and having to leave
her home because video gamers have ethics. Don’t expect it to make any more
sense than this.
The charge appears to be that as grown
adults journalists (we’ve moved on from developers now you’ll note, because ethics) shouldn’t fraternize with or indeed know anyone
who works in the field they write about. That such a view of human relations
should be expounded by a group whose primary interaction with other
people consists of shouting homophobic slurs at them during multiplayer games
in which simulated murder and pillage are actively rewarded is frankly
baffling. It’s almost like they’ve got no idea how to talk to people in the
real world or something.
3. Moving Swiftly On…
So yeah, conflating these two issues is
delicate ground, and I fully realize that in doing so I risk belittling the
genuine suffering of the women forced into sexual slavery by the Imperial
Japanese Army by association with such a pathetic, confected non-issue as ‘gamergate’.
But then women suffered as a result of that too (see the near constant torrent
of rape and death threats any women choosing to speak on this receives). There’s
also the way that in both cases ‘journalistic ethics’ have been set-up as a smokescreen which,
while pathetically transparent to most, has been repeated with such relentlessness
and persistence that it can’t help but drag a sizeable number of credulous unfortunates along with
it. At heart both issues are about men who for whatever reason don’t feel their
manifest import and influence have been adequately revered by the world at large
shamelessly exploiting what should be an irrelevancy to inflate their own egos and
shit all over undeserving women in the process.
It all fits a little too neatly into my own
pet analogy of Japan (or at least Japan’s general efforts at international
relations) as an overgrown manchild who’s stayed shut up in his parents
basement through choice for far too long, only to get finally kicked out and
emerge, blinking and stuttering, into the daylight to find that real people in
the real world don’t work like the simulations he’s been running on his
state-of-the-art home gaming set up. He’s invested far too much time, money,
and faith in technology for use at home and neglected the importance of
maintaining relationships with those around him, and in his frustration at the
world not being arranged exactly to his liking acts out by alternating between bouts
of impulsive violence and long periods of angsty introspection. The degree
to which the Japanese (un)diplomatic effort mirrors the self-absorbed whining
of teenage boys (or men who shamefully still act like boys) makes me want to
weep. I would not have been at all surprised to see Abe storming out of the
General Assembly screaming about how he hates us, how life is SO unfair, how we’re
not even his real dad.
I exaggerate. But not, sadly, by much. If you
want to be taken seriously by people then first you must take people seriously,
and the casual dismissal, persistent badgering, and outright abuse of anyone
who doesn’t belong in your own in-group is not concordant with that. A lot of
these issues are only live because people who profess to want them dead stubbornly
persist in performing CPR on them through their own lead-footed, tin-eared efforts to
defend the indefensible. The gentlemen do protest too much, methinks.
Bravo.
ReplyDeleteAn irrational nation. I did not question intelligence, nor did I laud the rationality of our nations; however, living in Japan, one comes to the conclusion that whether reason is the fruit of Aristotle of the Renaissance it is a fruit sown in European soil (when sown at all).
I have a suspicion that Japan is actually leading the field on this one, in a perverse kind of way. One of the main global political trends over the last couple of decades or so has been once-dominant groups (rich white men in most cases) getting their right to dominance more openly and effectively questioned. Japan's demographic, economic, and historical idiosyncrasies just mean that's coming to a head earlier here than in the rest of the First World. Now, having that right to dominance questioned is not the same as having that dominance removed, but here we have the added amusement that it's occurring on an inter- rather than intra-national scale, so it's just more visible in general.
DeleteI hope. But then what do I know?