A deceptively quick read, for all that this
is a book that could never be accused of wearing its pretensions lightly. Never
mind the quality, feel the research.
A pleasingly concise and accessible catalogue
of rhetorical figures. While occasionally slightly too pleased with itself in
the way that only expensively educated Englishmen of a certain age (and the
texts they produce) can be, its underlying message that anyone can be taught to produce a decent turn of phrase is
something I can definitely get behind. Would make a nice twofer with You Talkin’ to Me? as a starter set on oratory
and persuasion. And that’s all I have to say about that.
I’m going to cop out of this one slightly.
Firstly, I figure that after going so thoroughly to town on Inversions we could probably all do with
a bit of a break from overthinking Banks.
This is where we got to last time. The key thing to remember is that we’re trying to place as few constraints on the students as possible. Everything we give them ourselves is something they don’t have to work out for themselves and real communication can't be atomised like that. There is no such thing as ‘context-free’; if it looks like something really doesn’t have context, than you just need to work harder at finding it.
So finally we come to the meat of it. Once
more, this is tailored to my specific situation; your mileage will definitely
vary, and that is as it should be.
Wherein I riff gratefully and unashamedly
on Chris’ outstanding concept of a Conversation Contest. This is the first
iteration. It will not be perfect and there will be flaws, but given the source
of the idea going through the process out loud and in public seems like the
right thing to do; it might be useful, or at least interesting (or at least amusing),
for people to see exactly what kind of considerations can go into a lesson
before its actual execution. Putting my money where my mouth is, that kind of thing...